The results are fantastic but as with all software, it has its shortcomings. Its simplicity and layout are refreshing. After talking to my more technically oriented friends they assured me this is the best way to sharpen files as of today.Īfter working for a few months with this software, I admit I like it a lot. Part of the secret formula could be the unique R-L deconvolusion sharpening method offered by the program. Look at the stunning details in this example (Iridient Developer).Ĭlearly, the Iridient Developer is doing a fantastic job of extracting every single detail from the RAW files. Please click on double images for full view.

The purpose of this comparison is to look at details only. Please ignore the colour matching and other minor differences. More processing followed and after a few days of comparing the files with the C1 and Lightroom, my conclusion was in: This is the best processing software for X-Trans Sensor files if you are looking for razor-sharp details! Grinning happily, I went back to the Iridient Developer site and bought the full version. In fact, the details I saw approached the details on the D800 files. I could see every imperfection on the hood and tire marks I hadn’t seen before.

What a party it was! First on my agenda were some photos of dusty old trucks. Then when nobody was watching I indulged myself in an orgy of pixel peeping.

I processed a few files and exported them to Lightroom. From the first I liked the simple, logical layout. If Adobe couldn’t do it, why would they do it? One weekend I decided to download a trial version of Iridient Developer and take a look. I have to admit that my early reaction was sceptical. Then, almost out of the blue came a little known software, Iridient Developer. As usual with the Internet, everyone saw something different but in general the majority crowned the C1 as the best bet for the X-Trans sensor files treatment. All pixel peepers went berserk with 100%, 200% and _% comparisons between different RAW processors. Along with the support came a sigh of relief, as the files from C1 show a much better rendition of tiny things. What happened to the details that are supposed to be present in the files of an aliasing-filter-free camera with a revolutionary sensor? They were simply not there for many. Anticipation and excitement turned into a spate of cries and accusations. The RAW saga with the X-Trans Sensor started when Adobe issued its support for the sensor (I didn’t mention Silkypix since nobody wanted to learn this unintuitive software). Indeed, the JPEGs from Fuji X-Trans cameras have been spectacular.įor the RAW shooters, however, it wasn’t all roses. The APS-C sensor that could challenge full format cameras was something that hadn’t been done before. When Fuji introduced the X-Trans Sensor there was great excitement in the photographic community. It won’t make you a better photographer, it won’t help you to take a better photos and it may drag you into the dark world of pixel peeping and other such disorders. Keep in mind that the subject matter presented in this article is secondary to almost all other topics in photography. However, if you cannot sleep at night because your processed files don’t show every single detail available at 100% or you print larger than 12×18, please keep going. It is not going to do your photography any good. If you are wise enough to shoot JPEG only, if you don’t print larger than 12×18 or prefer to spend your time on what is really important in photography (light, composition, etc.) – enjoy the images below but please ignore the article.

Best setting iridient developer x trans